SGBM FAQs
Accessing Support Resources & Accommodations
A: Yes, an individual can come forward to seek supportive measures without filing a formal complaint. However, if information reported requires the College to investigate the matter for the safety and protection of our community in accordance with federal and state laws, then the College will do so. Once again, no one will be forced to participate in the process.
A: No. Employees and students who have an anonymous reporting obligation, such as Victim Advocates and Peer Health Educators (PHEs), will continue their work as anonymous resources. Anonymous resources are required to relay only non-identifying information to the Title IX coordinator (e.g., date, time, location) when they receive a report of SGBM.
Reporting SGBM
A: If the incident reported represents an emergency or an immediate risk to health/safety, Campus Safety or local police will take immediate steps to protect the community and any relevant party.
If the incident reported does not constitute an immediate threat or after any such steps to address the emergency are taken, the Title IX coordinator or designee will reach out to the complainant to schedule a time to review their options, rights, and resources.
A: When meeting with the Title IX coordinator to review your options, rights, and resources, you will be informed that you do have the right to request for the College not to investigate.
If you make such a request, the College will determine whether it can grant such a request or if the College is required to investigate based on the information provided in accordance with College policy and federal and state laws. For more information, please reference either the 2024-2025 Title IX Policy for Students.”
Formal Complaint Process
A: No. If you file a formal complaint, the allegations reported will determine whether the Title IX process has jurisdiction and must be utilized.
A: Parties are able to work with an advisor of their choice (AoC) throughout the reporting, investigation, and adjudication process. Each party is required to have an AoC to conduct cross-examination on the party’s behalf during the live hearing. While Ȧ cannot control who a party selects as their AoC, Ȧ will provide an AoC to parties that do not have one. AoCs provided by the College will have received training and demonstrated competence in trauma-informed practices, effective and appropriate questioning, and institutional policies and processes.
A: The new regulations require that questions and evidence regarding a complainant’s sexual predisposition and sexual behavior are automatically deemed irrelevant, and thus cannot be used during the investigation and adjudication process. However, the regulations specify two exceptions to this provision that may be considered relevant:
Questions and evidence about the complainant’s prior sexual behavior that are offered to prove that someone other than the respondent committed the conduct;
Questions and evidence that concern specific incidents of the complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the respondent and are offered to prove consent.
A: No one will be forced to participate in any part of the reporting, investigation, or adjudication process. Parties or witnesses who decline to participate in the live hearing will still be permitted to have their previous statements and submitted evidence be considered by the adjudication panel for reaching a determination of responsibility.
A: Sanctioning under the new Title IX policy will remain the same, which includes a range of possible sanctions and will be followed by an opportunity for the parties to appeal the outcome.
Federal Regulations
A: Yes. These regulations have the force and effect of law, which means that the federal government can and will take action against institutions that are non-compliant. Institutions must implement the required changes by August 1, 2024.
A: The relationship between Ȧ and SSPD will not be altered by the new regulations. When a Title IX or non-Title IX SGBM case coincides with a law enforcement investigation, officials from both entities will communicate to ensure that the separate processes work within their legal boundaries and respect the complainant’s decision on how to move forward.
A: Any SGBM incident that occurred (and completed in its entirety) before August 1, 2024 that would have fallen under the jurisdiction of Title IX will use the 2023-2024 Title IX Policy for Students.
Any SGBM incident that occurred (and completed in its entirety) before August 1, 2024 that would have fallen under the jurisdiction of the Enough is Enough policy IX will use the 2024-2025 Title IX Policy for Students.
Any SGBM incident that occurred entirely or partially on or after August 1, 2024 that would have fallen under the jurisdiction of Title IX will use the 2024-2025 Title IX Policy for Students.